Zealotry aside, two-spacing is superior from a parsing perspective. As far as effort, you can just add a keybinding to insert a period plus two spaces to make the effort the same. I may start doing this at some point and two-space future writing. I think it would be too much effort to convert existing code/writing or to try to two-space when working with others who don’t. In the end one-spacing vs. two-spacing really doesn’t matter all that much. Instead of reading this article, I suggest reading one of Steve Losh’s excellent posts on Common Lisp.
“Why I Two-Space”
Steve Losh’s article on using two spaces after a sentence continues to pop up, going mostly unchallenged it would seem. I personally fail to see any reason to use two spaces that isn’t completely subjective and find his arguments otherwise to be self-defeating.
His Arguments for Two Spaces
- It looks better when using a monospaced font.
- It gives the user more “power”
Two-Spacing is Pretty
This is entirely subjective. I use monospaced fonts all the time and still think two spaces in between a sentence looks hideous.
Two-Spacing Gives More Power?
Okay so what about the non-trivial argument? Well, it seems to be the same as the argument he says is not convincing (less effort). His specific example for “power” only applies to vim users and only to some of them.
This is what happens when I type
das in vim using his example.
Before with cursor above
Bob started speaking. Hello, Mr. Smi[t]h! How are you today?
Bob started speaking. How are you today?
It ends up looking exactly how I want. This is because I’m using reedes’
plugin that makes vim’s
is smarter. It even allows for adding
custom abbreviations to ignore. As Losh says, we can have our cake and
eat it too!
Granted, this plugin didn’t exist at the time of the article’s writing
(though the idea isn’t exactly hard to come up with). Even if this
plugin did not currently exist, his argument is bunk. What is the
benefit of being able to do things like
das? If what is meant by power
is not efficiency and saving keystrokes, effort, and time, then I’ve no
clue what the point is. Count how many times I’ve used abbreviations in
this post. You don’t even have to count the number sentences to realize
the number of extra keystrokes I would have had to type to put two
spaces in between every sentence is exponentially greater than the
single extra keystroke it would have taken me to deal with that
abbreviation if I had needed to (the dot command). So even if space is
only half a percent of keystrokes typed, the number of keystrokes needed
to deal with abbreviations is even more insignificant. So much for
As for parsing, this is merely a hypothetical. Has he ever needed to do that? I actually often use a script for counting sentences, and it’s really not that difficult to deal with single spaced sentences like textobj-sentence does. A script that chose not to deal with it would suffer from the problem of not working with anything written by people who don’t two-space. Unless this script needed to be absolutely perfect at counting, there would be no need to two-space sentences. This method of counting one-spaced sentences only fails in the rare case that a sentence actually does end with an abbreviation.
Emacs users can find an equivalent of